Videos @ subdot.net

Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt11

Uploaded by: cspander
Video Description:
Part 11 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Jon Kyl questions Gonzales. 7/24/07
KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!"
Transcript of this portion of the hearing: KYL: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Attorney General, as I understand it -- and I'm going to ask you to correct me if I'm wrong, to your knowledge -- the administration position on Guantanamo Bay is that, while it would be nice if we didn't have the need
for it and we'd like to be able to close it, we can't because the terrorists who represent a threat to the United States need to be held somewhere and there are no better alternatives. KYL: Almost nobody wants them in the United States. You can't just let them go. Sending them to foreign countries
is problematic, among other reasons for the reasons you discussed. Is that your understanding? And, if not, what is your understanding? GONZALES: Yes. KYL: Do you have any different reasons for desiring to close Gitmo, for example, because to your knowledge or suspicion, is there anything going
on down there that might be a violation of either U.S. law or applicable treaties or conventions? GONZALES: Quite the contrary. I think if people who have gone down there in this body, from the House, other countries, have come away favorably impressed with what's going on down there. KYL: I just
want to associate myself with the remarks of Senator Hatch. It would be nice if we didn't have to have any prisons for that matter. And it would certainly be good if we didn't have to have a place for these threats to America. But they do have to be held somewhere, and I know of no better alternativ
e than where they're being held right now. Let me ask you this question about a matter that you know I'm very interested in -- and as a matter of fact in a related, potentially related, matter, there is a scandal now brewing with regard to the National Basketball Association. Sports entities, in p
articularly the NFL, major league baseball, basketball, the NCAA -- amateur athletics, have for a long time been concerned about Internet betting, which is illegal under most state laws and we have our federal laws as well. You have -- and you're aware that on October 13th the president signed into
law the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act to augment enforcement efforts by targeting offshore gambling operations that are not readily subject to U.S. prosecution. KYL: There are additional, existing laws -- the Federal Wire Act and money laundering laws that can be and have been used t
o go after these Internet gambling operators. I realize that you can't comment on any existing cases, but I'd like for you to just express to the committee generally what your views are with respect to the department's intentions with respect to going after these illegal Internet gambling operatio
ns. GONZALES: Thank you, Senator. I appreciate your leadership on this issue. We do believe it's a serious issue because, when you talk about Internet gambling, it's highly-addictive. Quite frankly, I think it affects our youth. I think it can be tied to money laundering and fraud, and we think i
t's tied to organized crime. There are existing laws on the books, and we can and do enforce those laws. There are challenges because of the existing laws, challenges because, much of the time, the evidence is offshore. We may have difficulty in getting the evidence. Also, because it involves anoth
er country, there are sometimes serious issues of extradition. So we appreciate the additional tools of this Unlawful Internet Gambling Act which bans certain financial payments to support Internet Gambling. And, as you know, Treasury and the Federal Reserve have primary responsibility for the is
suance of these regulations after consulting with the Department of Justice. We've provided input, and so my understanding is that those regs are moving forward. KYL: The regs -- the proposed regs have been made public. My question really was a broader one. You have engaged in prosecutions under ot
her laws as well, and I was simply giving you an opportunity to express your intentions to continue to enforce all of these laws to the extent that they need to be enforced. GONZALES: We certainly intend to do that, and you have my commitment, Senator. KYL: Incidentally, I may have not been clear
in my reference to the NBA. I'm not suggesting that there's evidence of illegal Internet gambling with respect to that, but simply wanted to point out that these sports depend on the public's view that they are unadulterated, that they're clean, that they are not being affected by illegal forces. A
nd that's why they're so supportive of this legislation, to make sure that illegal Internet gambling does not, in any way, intrude into those sports. And I think Americans have a right to have that assurance. Mr. Attorney General, the FBI is facing a mounting caseload of applications from foreign n
ationals seeking to enter the United States or to adjust status. The FBI, of course, does background checks, but there is a huge backlog, as you know. What technologies or resources can Congress secure for the FBI to ensure that's it's able to timely process applications without compromising the sa
fety and security of the American people? GONZALES: This is a problem that I have discussed with the director. You're talking about background checks, individuals from other countries. It does take us a long time in some cases, because of the fact it requires us to get information and records from
other countries. I know that the director is focused on trying to get additional resources, additional individuals, maybe contract work out to helping in this endeavor. And so he's also looking at new computer system technology, taking advantage of technology... KYL: Let me just interrupt because
of the time. There's a huge backlog. It shouldn't exist. Do we need to provide additional resources, Congress? GONZALES: I don't know whether or not additional resources are required from the Congress. I do know that additional resources within the bureau have to be focused on this issue. And it m
ay be -- the director may come to me and say, "Well, if we do that, we're not going to be able to protect America from terrorism the way we ought to be in other areas." And so I don't know the answer to that. But certainly more resources are necessary. We may already have the resources within the b
ureau. I suspect the director will say no. KYL: We need to know if there's something else we can do, because you cannot compromise security and we cannot tolerate the long backlogs that currently exist. So something needs to give here. And if it is that we need more resources, Congress needs to be
advised. Let me quickly, while I have just a second, ask one final question. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection -- DHS reports that 16 percent of foreign nationals apprehended illegally crossing the southern border have criminal histories. That's about 140,000 individuals in the year 2005. And
if that's not alarming enough, DOJ and the GAO indicate that criminal aliens in the U.S. are re-arrested on an average of six to eight times per offender, which puts a huge strain on both federal, state and local law enforcement officers, prosecutors, courts and our jails. Is the Department of Just
ice undertaking any initiatives with DHS to proactively identify and prosecute and remove criminal aliens? And, here again, is there any authority or resource that Congress needs to provide to DOJ to assist in the prosecution of these criminal aliens? GONZALES: I think that, quite candidly, Senator
, if you were to talk to my board of U.S. attorneys, they would say we need more resources. And so, we're always looking at ways to try to find those resources within the existing budget. Obviously the president has to consider a number of priorities with respect to the budget that he submits to th
e Congress. And the Congress, of course, ultimately makes the decision as to where those priorities should come out. But we're having to be smart. We're trying to have -- to be more efficient. But it does present or has presented some challenges for us. KYL: In effect -- Mr. Chairman, could I just
do one follow-up question? In effect, are you saying... LEAHY: Go ahead. KYL: ... you understand the president's budget priorities and needs all across the government but, if more resources could be made available to you, you could certainly take advantage of them, could certainly use them? GON
ZALES: We certainly would put them to good use. LEAHY: Of course, you're also aware that the president said if we put any money in there beyond what he's asked for, he'll veto the bill?

Related Videos

Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt2	Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt3	Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt20
Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt30	Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt24	Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt4

Comments for this video: Show || Hide


Tell a friend:

1. Your name:
2. Your friend's name:
3. Your friend's e-mail:
4. Your message:

URL
Embed Code