Republican Joe Barton v. Al Gore



Uploaded by: Politicstv
Video Description:
Joe Barton and Al Gore exchange remarks at a congressional hearing (Mar. 21, 2007)


Tags for this video: al barton change climate global gore joe politicstv republican warming

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by Politicstv

Related Videos
AL GORE: Global Warming Testimony @ Congress 3.21.07Congressman Lampson and Al Gore - Longer VersionJoint Global Warming Hearing: Al Gore Opening Part 2
al-gore-global-warming-testimony-congress-32107.htmlal-gore-global-warming-testimony-congress-32107.htmlal-gore-global-warming-testimony-congress-32107.html
Congressman Lampson Questions Al Gore During Climate HearingAl Gore Vs Sen. James Inhofe Dems Show Down barbara BoxerGlenn Beck on The NY Times Attacking Al Gore
al-gore-global-warming-testimony-congress-32107.htmlal-gore-global-warming-testimony-congress-32107.htmlal-gore-global-warming-testimony-congress-32107.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
yes, it is easy to ... ( 1 day ago by sketchmaker)
yes, it is easy to see that this is not your field and that you've never read the report.
i've already had this discussion with others.
when summary reports come out saying what 'would' or 'could' happen without giving the whole picture this is what happens.
if you wish to take your information from a summary given by people who openly admit to using scare tactics in order to get people to do the 'right thing' you are condemned to believe whatever lies they feed you.
Of course I know ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
Of course I know the outcome of the report and I know it better than you. You're so dumb you don't understand what you're reading that's your problem.
gore along with ... ( 1 day ago by sketchmaker)
gore along with others on the side of agw have admitted to using scare tactics in order to advance their agenda.
if gore actually believed what he was saying he'd not be living in a home which burns more power than a dozen average homes.
he's a hypocrit and willing to falsify anything to promote his own agenda.
Array ( 1 day ago by sketchmaker)
larilin,
you've already admitted that you've never even read the report so, no, you don't know the outcome of the report. you only know what has been printed in the summaries.
by the way, when you resort to name calling when you have nothing to stand on it only shows your ignorance.
another little tid bit. satellite data, weather balloon data and MOST of the weather stations have shown a slight decline in temps since 1999.
land based weather ... ( 1 day ago by sketchmaker)
land based weather stations which did show increase had been improperly installed.(posted beside AC units, over concrete, asphalt and at least one posted never burn barrels)
properly installed weather stations showed no warming trend. either stability or slight decline same as weather balloons and satellite data.
it makes a HUGE difference where you get your data.
fgfgfdgdgfdg ( 1 day ago by larilin)
fgfgfdgdgfdg
Sketchmaker, you ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
Sketchmaker, you are one confused individual! I don't think there's hope for you but this nonsense you're wiritng shouldn't be allowed to stand. I'll deal with your delutions one at a time.
First, CO2 and temperature: When viewed coarsely, historical CO2 levels and temperature show a tight correlation. A closer examination of the CH4, CO2, and temperature fluctuations recorded in the Antarctic ice core records reveals that, yes, temperature moved first.
But this is where ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
But this is where you get confused. It is misleading to say that temperature rose and then, hundreds of years later, CO2 rose. These warming periods lasted for 5,000 to 10,000 years (the cooling periods lasted more like 100,000 years!), so for the majority of that time (90% and more), temperature and CO2 rose together. This remarkably detailed archive of climatological evidence clearly allows for CO2 acting as a cause for rising temperatures, while also revealing it can be an effect of them.
The current ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
The current understanding of those cycles is that changes in orbital parameters (the Milankovich and other cycles) caused greater amounts of summer sunlight to fall in the northern hemisphere. This is a small forcing, but it caused ice to retreat in the north, which changed the albedo. This change -- reducing the amount of white, reflective ice surface -- led to further warmth, in a feedback effect.
Some number of ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
Some number of centuries after that process started, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere began to rise, which amplified the warming trend even further as an additional feedback mechanism. So it is correct that CO2 did not trigger the warmings, but it definitely contributed to them -- and according to climate theory and model experiments, greenhouse gas forcing was the dominant factor in the magnitude of the ultimate change.
sdsdsd ( 1 day ago by larilin)
sdsdsd
ewqeqewqeqewqeq ( 1 day ago by larilin)
ewqeqewqeqewqeq
You can't for ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
You can't for example understand the global character of glacial endings and the corresponding temperature amplitudes without a CO2 feedback.
It comes as no ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
It comes as no surprise that other factors besides CO2 affect climate. Changes in the amount of summer sunshine, for example, have long been known to affect the comings and goings of ice ages.
But let me guess, ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
But let me guess, this is to complicated for you, right? It's easier to blame it on some conspiracy involving Al Gore and researchers hungry for grants...
Ok, your next ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
Ok, your next stupid little comment, that "satellite data, weather balloon data and MOST of the weather stations have shown a slight decline in temps since 1999." Again, you haven't got your facts straight:
The MSU Satellite temperature analysis now shows warming well in line with model expectations. There was a debate about this and turned out to be a great validation of the models and a real death blow to the "earth is not warming" crowd.
If you were interested in FACTS, which you are not,
sdsd ( 1 day ago by larilin)
sdsd
this stupid website ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
this stupid website won't let me post my comment
asasdsadsadsda ( 1 day ago by larilin)
asasdsadsadsda
asa ( 1 day ago by larilin)
asa
asaa ( 1 day ago by larilin)
asaa
you could find the ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
you could find the information here:
you could find the ... ( 1 day ago by larilin)
you could find the information here: But, of course, you're immune to scientific information. You just visit websites run by right-wing republicans who hate Al Gore and are driven by ideology not the search for truth, and get your talking points from there. I have no illusion that you are actually going to deal with my arguments. You'll just do what conspiracy theorists always do, change the subject and present yet another Sarah Palin talking point.
"(James)Hansen I've ... ( 6 hours ago by icecreamdose)
"(James)Hansen I've known for many years. He's a very good climate scientist,but he's decided to do the politics. I feel that he's doing some cherry-picking of his own. At that point, he's not really being a scientist. At that point, you're being a lawyer. He's being an effective
 advocate for his side, but in the process of doing that he's no longer a neutral party and he's no longer giving both sides of the issues." -Prof Richard A. Muller,UC Berkeley global warming believer Grist interview



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code