Search Tags:

Categories:

Lec 16 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002



Uploaded by: MIT
Video Description:
Electromagnetic Induction
Faraday's Law
Lenz Law
Complete Breakdown of Intuition
Non-Conservative Fields
View the complete course at: http://ocw.mit.edu/8-02S02 License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA More information at http://ocw.mit.edu/terms More courses at http://ocw.mit.edu


Tags for this video: and charge Coulomb's electric electromagnetism electrostatics Introduction law matter mit of structure to

Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by MIT

Related Videos
Intro | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002Lec 2 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002Lec 3 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002
intro-mit-802-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002.htmlintro-mit-802-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002.htmlintro-mit-802-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002.html
Lec 5 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002Lec 11 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002Lec 19 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002
intro-mit-802-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002.htmlintro-mit-802-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002.htmlintro-mit-802-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
very good. Thank You ( 5 months ago by RobertKubica1121)
very good. Thank You
This guy is great. ( 4 months ago by robakerson)
This guy is great.
The girl at 2:15 ... ( 4 months ago by sgoo7)
The girl at 2:15 was awesome. mwah to her
28:45 The flux ... ( 4 months ago by elassowipeo12)
28:45 The flux remains the same, no matter what shape the closed loop is; of what consequence is this?
38:55 Solenoid replaces battery, solenoid seems to be placed in not wired into curcuit???
The magnetic field ... ( 3 months ago by cgibbard)
The magnetic field is (almost) all inside the solenoid, and so the magnetic flux through the surface of any closed loop that goes once around the solenoid will be the same, and so the induced current will be the same. However, when he makes a different closed loop, which winds multiple times around the solenoid, the flux through the surface on that loop is different, and the induced current is larger. The solenoid is indeed not wired into the circuit. It's the magnetic flux which counts.
(Hmm, my previous ... ( 3 months ago by cgibbard)
(Hmm, my previous comment didn't seem to post, here's another attempt.) The flux through the attached surface for any loop that goes once around the solenoid is the same, regardless of its shape, but when the loop is wound multiple times around the solenoid, the surface passes multiple times through the solenoid, and the flux and hence the induced current is increased. The solenoid is indeed not wired into the circuit. It's the changing magnetic field it provides which induces a current.
Yeah, a very big ... ( 3 months ago by kermittherabbit)
Yeah, a very big mwah to the pretty princess!!!
It's neat that prof ... ( 2 months ago by jonahansen)
It's neat that prof lewin took the time to review these and correct mistakes - it makes them even better/
His accent sounds ... ( 2 months ago by flashback1234)
His accent sounds dutch. Does somebody know if he is?
my textbook makes ... ( 2 months ago by theGreatSheva)
my textbook makes that mistake...with the non conservative fields... damn book manipulates the circuit to make Kirchoff's laws seem right...a fucking textbook! that i paid a 100 bucks for... -_-
Me brother had this ... ( 2 months ago by decade03)
Me brother had this guy a year ago, said he was a conservative looney meaning he didn't show the full potential, but a great professor
Yeah, he is.. ( 2 months ago by henan8)
Yeah, he is..
cool ( 2 months ago by flashback1234)
cool
I can't wrap my ... ( 1 month ago by 4pharaoh)
I can't wrap my mind around the demonstration given on the last few minutes on this lecture. Does anyone have the details of exactly what was done? It would seem that two separate inputs fed from exactly the same source read completely different voltages, and that can't be the case. I have to assume there is something not seen here
is the man at 2:30 ... ( 2 weeks ago by ofey137)
is the man at 2:30 a maths prof maybe?:D



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code