9/11 Flight 93 Rare Footage



Uploaded by: thetruthwillout
Video Description:
Ultra-rare news footage from the crash site of United Flight 93 which has never been seen again since 9/11.


Tags for this video: 9/11 93 Flight United

Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by thetruthwillout

Related Videos
Rumsfeld says Flight 93 was "shot down."9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
rumsfeld-says-flight-93-was-shot-down.htmlrumsfeld-says-flight-93-was-shot-down.htmlrumsfeld-says-flight-93-was-shot-down.html
1st 9/11 Crash9/11 WTC RARE FOOTAGE OF FLIGHT 93 ON CAMERA EXPOSED9/11 Flight 93 Rare Footage
rumsfeld-says-flight-93-was-shot-down.htmlrumsfeld-says-flight-93-was-shot-down.htmlrumsfeld-says-flight-93-was-shot-down.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
wtc7 collapsed in ... ( 14 hours ago by 911insidejob8)
wtc7 collapsed in 11.september at 5:20 pm. It looked like controlled demolition! And it was!!!! If it was controlled demolition than they knew about 9/11 before it took place. It takes days to plan and prepare for controlled demolition. ( not 8 hours)
"Operation ... ( 14 hours ago by 911insidejob8)
"Operation Northwoods" in 1962 was a plan by governament to stage acts of real terrorism on US soil and against U.S. interests and then put the blame of these acts on Cuba in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro.Kennedy did not approve it in 1962.Bush did in 2001. 9/11 inside job. It is in wikipedia!!! google "Operation Northwoods"
wtc7 collapsed in ... ( 14 hours ago by 911insidejob8)
wtc7 collapsed in 11.september at 5:20 pm. It looked like controlled demolition! And it was!!!! If it was controlled demolition than they knew about 9/11 before it took place. It takes days to plan and prepare for controlled demolition. ( not 8 hours)
Thanks Ruzzidummi ... ( 14 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
Thanks Ruzzidummi for your reply. It is of course entirely ridiculous and quite laughable to suggest that a plane would hit the ground and vanish into it. The sad part is that it would seem about 30% of your American people are stupid enough to believe this obvious bullshit. All you seem to have is the word of your government and as you will eventually figure out - we don't believe them. Planes do not burrow themselves into the ground you moron! (check out"Building Seven Blues") Phil Toms, NZ.
It's all a big snow ... ( 13 hours ago by statechic)
It's all a big snow job outside the reality which the most of us have been conditioned by the great god known as television to either accept, or to begin reexamining. No more than 5 corporations now control mainstream media, including all tv, all FM and AM radio, 96% of all newspapers, and 90% of all magazines. No typo there on the 5 corporations. Easy enough for those 5 boards of directors to dictate what we see and believe, and for our kids to value or not value.
a plane didn't ... ( 13 hours ago by xSammBAM)
a plane didn't crash!!!
we need a new investigation into 9-11.
No Plane = No Plane ... ( 13 hours ago by BoomBoomAbby)
No Plane = No Plane
Flight 93 landed at Cleveland Airport and was taken to a secured area. What happened after that remains a mystery. Research Delta Flight 1989 as it too was thought to have a bomb on board and was taken to a secured area of the same Cleveland Airport. These passengers were released.
If you search for ... ( 13 hours ago by BoomBoomAbby)
If you search for AA 11 or AA 77 on different days, you will find that they were regularly scheduled flights right up to Sept 10. AA 11 was scheduled daily from Logan to LA at 8.00, and AA 77 from Dulles to LA at 7.45. On Sept 11, they were not scheduled. Not cancelled. Just not scheduled.
TWOOFERS = PARANOID ... ( 12 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
TWOOFERS = PARANOID DELUSIONAL PEOPLE
Its funny how you guys watch your TWOOFER vids then come here all pent up and u try to release your frustrations. AND SINCE ITS TRUTH YOU DESIRE: GOOGLE 'MOUSSAOUI TRIAL' GO TO THE TOP ITEM "On July 31, 2006, the 1,202 exhibits presented during the case of United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui wer
e posted online, marking the first time the exhibits of a criminal case in U.S. courts were so published" SO MUCH FOR THE GOVERNMENT HIDING ALL THE EVIDENCE
What a canard! That ... ( 12 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
What a canard! That and the one united 93 landing in cleveleand. I am sick of doing your research for you guys all the time. You are all the biggest bunch of INTELLECTUALLY LAZY MORONS EVER theres so much evidence out there that debunks evey one of your 911 myths. ITS BEEN 7 years AND YOU GOT NOTHING. IF ONE OF YOU COULD POST SOMETHING CREDIBLE I WOULD LOVE THAT, AS I AM TIRED OF THE SAME OLD DEBUNKED CRAP FROM TWOOFER VIDS.
BTW that poll was also debunked too.IF YOU WANT THE REAL LINK I GOT IT
Heres the order of ... ( 12 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
Heres the order of vid i am posting: 1. WTC 7 Collapse Explained for the guy in nevada- 2. United 93 DID not land in Cleveland- 3- 95% of United 93 Found
watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 watch?v=iVbw4tbq7jM watch?v=xkivdEGph9A
ruzziduzzi i ... ( 11 hours ago by cdddraffsman)
ruzziduzzi i watched all that, but it shows inside job. i dont know why.
LMAO...there`s no ... ( 11 hours ago by BoomBoomAbby)
LMAO...there`s no plane in that big empty hole in Shanksville yet they somehow recover 95% of Flight 93?? HA HA HA!! That has to be the joke of the day.
The missing 5% must have been the supposed hijackers with box cutters. 9/11 was an inside job.
Thanks Nutti Twitti ... ( 10 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
Thanks Nutti Twitti I thought your last reply to me was particularly insightful - devastating logic. Could you please explain what a canard is. We don't have that word over here in New Zealand. Is it a type of bird? Maybe one got sucked into the engine? Perhaps you could post some of YOUR photos of the wreck of flight 93 because the ones I have seen only show an empty hole in a paddock???????????????????????????
Hey, reject ... ( 10 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
Hey, reject evidence that was admissable in a federal trial, i know the defense tried to BUT WAS FOUND GUILTY. Using a few TWOOFER VIDS from you-tube is not to credible, use draftsmans time testd and true TWOOFER method of proof: "i dont know why". THERES TOO MUCH PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, EYEWITNESS STATEMENTS AND TESTIMONY, AND CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE that means you guys are in complete denial of reality.
Perhaps when the ... ( 9 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
Perhaps when the plane vanished into the ground they all ended up in 1963 at the "Enchantment Under The Sea" high school ball? You could always call in the team from Stargate, except of course they ARE canadian, and you can't be too careful these days. This is the only rational explanation as to how a hollow aeroplane could vanish into a solid object.
It didnt vanish, ... ( 9 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
It didnt vanish, the rcovered 95% of it. the CDR was found buried 8 meters deep. Both engines were covered. READ THE EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS DUMBASS, YOU WERENT THERE, BUT 100's OF PEOPLE WERE. You just dont want to read CREDIBLE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE WHAT IT PROVES, THATS YOU ARE CATEGORICALLY 100% WRONG ABOUT YOUR WHOLE 911 MYTH, and their statements DO PROVE YOU WRONG. So dont sit here and whine about things GO READ WHAT THE PEOPLE SAID WHO WERE THERE. FFS U LAZY TWOOFERS
So if you are to ... ( 8 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
So if you are to base your entire case on eyewitnesses then clearly you believe the many who said they heard explosions in the twin towers? I look forward to seeing your photographs of the same green paddock with the gouge in it and the same men in yellow coats pulling out wreckage with a crane. It is simply ridiculous to suggest that a plane buried its self 8 metres into the ground with nothing left exposed. Are you a creationist? Do you also believe the sun goes around the earth?
Like i said YOU ARE ... ( 8 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
Like i said YOU ARE IN DENIAL. Because your PEANUT BRAIN thinks something is 'rediculous' IS NOT PROOF by any stretch of the imagination, AT LEAST NOT IN THE REAL WORLD, so if you would like to stop being in denial and COME JOIN US HERE IN REALITY, get out of your MOMMY's BASEMENT and enjoy your life and your freedom, IF YOU EVEN HAVE IT(i assume like most PARANOID DELSUSIONAL TWOOFERS you may not as you are probably a prisoner of your MIND).
I thought you ... ( 8 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
I thought you countered my arguments brilliantly. You are clearly a great intellect. Your logic is devastating. I seem to have misunderestimated you. Please explain what a canard is, do they nest near the twoofer? I think you mis-spelled ridiculous. However I would not use this to try to discredit you. That would be childish (sub-twoofer).
You dont have an ... ( 7 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
You dont have an arguement based on intellectual honesty. THERES JUST NO EVIDENCE EXCEPT THE MOUNTAIN OF PROOF THAT WAS THE BASIS OF THE MOUSSAOUI TRIAL AND THE 911 COMMISION. YOU HAVE PRESENTED NOTHING THAT SUMMARILY DISCREDITS ALL THAT CREDIBLE PROOF, nobody has pal, so u can go bird watching with all your straw man claims all you want, AND STILL NOBODY HAS COME FORWARD IN OVER 7 YEARS WITH PROOF THEY WERE A CO-CONSPIRATOR ON ANY 'INSIDE JOB' MYTH.PERIOD. your 'arguement' now thats REDICULOUS!
Of course you ... ( 7 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
Of course you cannot counter any of my points.Anyone can see by your complete lack of humour that you are the one whining. Actually I saw a large bird the other day - could have been a twoofer. It flew straight into the ground and vanished completely. However none of my friends believe me. They think I am lying to them. I don't understand why they are being so paranoid. I took a photo but all it showed was a hole in the ground. I can't understand why they don't believe me. Maybe it was a canard.
Ok you got a ... ( 6 hours ago by ruzziduzzi)
Ok you got a problem, YOUR TWOOFER logic or statements of FAITH IN YOUR UNPROVEN MYTH, present NOTHING THAT DISPROVES THE CREDIBLE EVIDENCE GATHERED AND PRESENTED IN A FEDERAL TRIAL. Maybe you should study up on 'admissable evidence'
GOOGLE 'MOUSSAOUI TRIAL' GO TO THE TOP ITEM "On July 31, 2006, the 1,202 exhibits presented during the case of United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui were posted online, marking the first time the exhibits of a criminal case in U.S. courts were so published"
Its a shame someone ... ( 2 hours ago by electriccarmusic)
Its a shame someone had to mess with this page so its all out of sequence and no longer makes sense. That's weird. Who does that crap?



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code