Search Tags:

Categories:

MSNBC Debates Moon Landing Hoax (2002)



Uploaded by: ConspiracyWorld
Video Description:
**COPYRIGHT
©2002, MSNBC, Inc.** Conspiracy theorist Bart Sibrel and astronomer Phil Plait debate whether the moon landing were faked on MSNBC's "The Abrams Report." This was broadcast in November 2002. This video is copyrighted material and the copyright owner is not affilated with me in anyway. No challeng
e for copyright is intended. If the copyright holder does not want this video on YouTube, please let me know by sending me a message using the link below and I will gladly remove it. http://www.youtube.com/outbox?to_user=ConspiracyWorld


Tags for this video: abrams aldrin armstrong buzz conspiracy coverup debate flag hoax landing moon msnbc nasa neil outer report space stars

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by ConspiracyWorld

Related Videos
MythBusters: Moon Landing Hoax MythMoon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage - Percy DebunkProof of moon landing hoax!
mythbusters-moon-landing-hoax-myth.htmlmythbusters-moon-landing-hoax-myth.htmlmythbusters-moon-landing-hoax-myth.html
MOON LANDING HOAX: NASA . Mitchell & Son Make Death Threats Moon Landing Hoax - Apollo 13 Trajectory - Jarrah DebunkMoon Landing Hoax-One Giant Spotlight For Mankind
mythbusters-moon-landing-hoax-myth.htmlmythbusters-moon-landing-hoax-myth.htmlmythbusters-moon-landing-hoax-myth.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Anyone pick up ... ( 3 days ago by northerntruthseeker)
Anyone pick up hornedbeast91's comment about "Conspiracy NUTS"???.... The common usage by Prideful believers to label people who want to investigate the truth as a bunch of NUTS! Any wonder why they will never quit with the need to defend the lie of Apollo? That is the typical answer by someone blinded by their own delusional self destructive pride, and unwilling to go through life without their blinders on! Its time for an awakening to the truth behind Apollo, and not propagandist BS!
Distrust in ... ( 3 days ago by northerntruthseeker)
Distrust in government? Like the same government that brought you the lies that brought about Gulf Wars I, and II (Saddam's phantom WMD's)? Like the same government that brought you Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin, anyone?), Like the same government that brought you Watergate (Nixon... I am not a crook!)? Like the same government that is covering up 9-11 (19 A-rabs with box cutters??? Give us a break!). That list can go on and on.... But hey, trust in the government, they can do no wrong!
This narrator is a ... ( 3 days ago by DMR40)
This narrator is a pompous prick and clearly biased towards the NASA rep.
Aside from that, the nasa response to the "no stars in the background" proof is pretty weak. They're faint? That's the best they can come up with? With Zero atmosphere (which makes stars show MORE) there isn't a single picture showing stars and no film of stars at all. You'd think with all the tho
usands of pictures taken at least ONE of them would have different contrast/focus settings that show stars.
The Hasselblad ... ( 2 days ago by Diamonddavej)
The Hasselblad 500EL/70 fitted with a Planar f 2.8/80mm lens and Kodak Ektachrome 160 ASA film, requires a ~150 second exposure to photograph the brightest stars. However, the camera exposure was set to day light, exposure was around 1/1000 to 1/4000th sec. Google "ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY WITH THE NIKON D70 DIGITAL SLR CAMERA", it will give you an idea of the exposure times needed to photograph stars. The first picture was 15 seconds at ISO1600, and it captures only a dozen brightest stars.
Actually, the NASA ... ( 2 days ago by Diamonddavej)
Actually, the NASA Hasselblad 500EL/70 used a Zeiss Biogon 5.6/60 mm lens, therefore it would have take even longer to photograph stars, due to the slower 5.6 the f-ratio.
You dont get it, ... ( 2 days ago by NelielTuOderswank)
You dont get it, Because theres no atmosphere the sun shines 100 times more brightly than when not protected behind an atmosphere. The stars are completely overshadowed by the light.
anyone who says we ... ( 2 days ago by majorgambrell)
anyone who says we didnt make 2 the moon is lieing,and i sorry to say un american
so comment and post all u want but we made 2 the moon so u got 2 be idoits if u say they didnt
northerntruthseeker ... ( 2 days ago by lippypet)
northerntruthseeker, it must be lonely in your basement.. huh? With all that time on your hands I would start thinking everyone is out to get me also. I see you're playing stupid, looks like you're winning too.
haha the news ... ( 2 days ago by 2mONs2)
haha the news reporters voice goes so high when he says 'hoax'
Is that fat guy ... ( 2 days ago by YouSunkMyFishy)
Is that fat guy going to die? He bet his life, and lost...
P.S. To all ... ( 2 days ago by YouSunkMyFishy)
P.S. To all conspiracy theorists, out there. Watch the latest MythBusters episode, they tested it and -THAT'S RIGHT- we went to the moon. Don't agree? Just watch the episode!
To all conspiracy ... ( 2 days ago by frostmage300)
To all conspiracy theorists:
Dont you think all your evidence is a bit too much?
I mean Nasa and the goverment are groups of intellgent people. (e.g. Scientists)
If they realy staged it, then why on earth would they make no stars if its 'unrealistic' or make flag wave or light up everything.
If it was made by professional film makers and stuff like that then dont you think the 'mistakes' are just too big for grown ups who specialise in science and film making?
I'll never believe ... ( 1 day ago by DancingQueen41)
I'll never believe the moon landing was true. I saw a documentary where an outstanding scientist said "We did not have the technology to land on the moon then and we don't have it now."
Well according to ... ( 1 day ago by DMR40)
Well according to that logic, the stars would also shine 100 times brighter. And even then why didnt they take pictures during the moon's night cycle?
Son we even brought ... ( 1 day ago by FIFTYCENTHATESTUPAC)
Son we even brought back moon rocks how could it be fake it we brought back moons rocks from the moon from freakin space..
"Well according to ... ( 1 day ago by Echard110)
"Well according to that logic, the stars would also shine 100 times brighter. And even then why didnt they take pictures during the moon's night cycle?" Because the astronauts were never on the moon when the sun wasn't shining.
"I saw a ... ( 1 day ago by Echard110)
"I saw a documentary where an outstanding scientist said "We did not have the technology to land on the moon then and we don't have it now."" Which scientist? Sibrel, Rene, Percy?? No actual scientist with a credible degree believes the landings were hoaxed.
Sure. . .Sibrel ... ( 1 day ago by gamr4life)
Sure. . .Sibrel says he would bet his life that they didn't go to the moon.
Strictly a cheap sales pitch to sell his worthless, comical videos. Mr. Plait just relies on presenting factual explanations---he doesn't have to hype it up like Sibrel.
You will never get ... ( 1 day ago by NelielTuOderswank)
You will never get it, Stars are overshadowed in the daytime here on earth, And in space its always day time as long as youre around the sun. And feel free to explain the equipment left by human hands still on the moon, Still sending signals. End of case.
Last night's ... ( 1 day ago by LunarTuner)
Last night's long-awaited "Mythbusters" episode slammed the Apollo Moon Hoax world onto its scientifically illiterate rear end. My favorite segment was the one on lunar laser range-finding as Apollo proof. Check it out: watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
NelielTuOderswank, ... ( 1 day ago by Echard110)
NelielTuOderswank, I'm convinced the Apollo missions were real, so your reply is confusing. "And in space its always day time as long as youre around the sun." My response was to why weren't pictures taken during the night cycle. The astronauts were never there during lunar night. "And feel free to explain the equipment left by human hands still on the moon, Still sending signals" The ALSEP's were shut down in 1977, but I agree the retroreflectors continue to function as designed.
Watch Myth busters ... ( 1 day ago by eireismehome)
Watch Myth busters about the moon hoax. It debunks many of the conspiracies and is a good watch.
"Watch Myth busters ... ( 1 day ago by Echard110)
"Watch Myth busters about the moon hoax." I agree. They took some of the hoaxers claims and put them to the test - real tests the hoaxers never bothered to do. Busted every time!
Whether you're an ... ( 7 hours ago by LunarTuner)
Whether you're an Apollo believer or doubter, you need to watch the recent "Mythbuster" material. They tested theories on the photos, gravity, the flag, footprints and retroreflectors. I've posted them all on my channel. Go to: "LunarTuner"



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code