Search Tags:

Categories:

Puppet Show Part 1



Uploaded by: JoshL11185
Video Description:
This is another video for class, History of Philosophy II. It's a puppet show about Immanuel Kant and his Moral Philosophy with an all star cast of Moses, Plato, Sigmund Frued, Colonel Sanders, Charles Dickens . The puppets are from philosophersguild.com BE SURE TO WATCH PART 2 FOR THE CONCLUSION!


Tags for this video: Categorical Frued History Immanuel Imperative Joshua Kant Leonard Moral One Part Philosophy Plato Puppet Show Sigmund

Find more videos in the "Comedy" category
See more videos uploaded by JoshL11185

Related Videos
The GroundingIt's you who doesn't exist MoFoEpistemologia - Kant
the-grounding.htmlthe-grounding.htmlthe-grounding.html
choiceskant songbertram @ IKS
the-grounding.htmlthe-grounding.htmlthe-grounding.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Well, it was only ... ( 1 year ago by JoshL11185)
Well, it was only my project, but yeah, I passed. I handed out little sheets for people to fill out while it was playing too.
Freud? Or ... ( 1 year ago by mavaddat)
Freud? Or Schwarzenegger?
LOL! ( 1 year ago by Zephon20)
LOL!
where did these ... ( 1 year ago by GreenPhilosopher)
where did these puppets come from
philosophersguild . ... ( 1 year ago by JoshL11185)
philosophersguild . com
FUNNY VOCIES LOL! ( 1 year ago by cindygonzalez101)
FUNNY VOCIES LOL!
long ( 1 year ago by cindygonzalez101)
long
I love it. Good job ... ( 11 months ago by altargirl89)
I love it. Good job. :-]
Very nice review, ... ( 9 months ago by Ben1524)
Very nice review, categorically:) I say.
Fantastic! If I ... ( 9 months ago by flofrasso)
Fantastic! If I tell my teacher I'm repeating Kant in this way, with this video, she will probably laugh for half an hour..! ^_^
Kant was not a ... ( 8 months ago by godlesstechnocrat)
Kant was not a philosoher, he was a theologian. He basically said so himself. He was the most wordy and pretentious theologian in the history of theology, but het was a theologian nonetheless. He was basically trying to save God from reason. I'm an atheist, so I can't take anything he says seriously.
Well, you obviously ... ( 8 months ago by JoshL11185)
Well, you obviously have not read a significant amount about him. Little is known about his life and what is shows him to be merely a man of habit and thought. He is not a theologian, and can clearly be seen as a diest, like many founding fathers. He talks about God, but in a more diestic sense as the principle cause. He knew nothing of Darwin or Physics, and therefore had no other explanation.
[From what has ... ( 8 months ago by godlesstechnocrat)
[From what has already been said, it is evident that] even the assumption--as made on behalf of the necessary practical em- ployment of my reason -- of God, freedom, and immortality is not permissible unless at the same time speculative reason be deprived of its pretensions to transcendent insight.
I have therefore ... ( 8 months ago by godlesstechnocrat)
I have therefore found it necessary to deny knowledge, in order to make room for faith. The dogmatism of metaphysics, that is, the precon- ception that it is possible to make headway in metaphysics with- out a previous criticism of pure reason, is the source of all that unbelief, always very dogmatic, which wars against morality.
From the Critique ... ( 8 months ago by godlesstechnocrat)
From the Critique of Pure Reason. If that's not a religious agenda, I don't know what is.
Indeed Kant ... ( 8 months ago by jcblkr)
Indeed Kant rejected the cosmological argument for the existence of God (along with all other alleged proofs). Instead the apparent teleological structure of nature is ascribed to reason and judgment itself (ref. KdU). God can never be an object of theoretical reason and hence is assigned the position of a practical postulate (of practical reason) along with equally transcendent issues, freedom and immortality.
Kant was ... ( 8 months ago by jcblkr)
Kant was emphatically not a theologian. At least not in any contemporary sense of that term. The entire critical method and the project of enlightenment signifies European culture's route away from religious dogmatism, relying instead of the autonomous capacity for critique inherent to reason. I have studied Kant intensively for nearly ten years now, and it is safe to say that your assesment is quite simply wrong.
OMG!!!!! This is my ... ( 8 months ago by Dranged1016)
OMG!!!!! This is my teacher!!!! He was showing us the Kant puppet today. Hes a great teacher. And you dont usualy forget his lectures easily.
A lot of people see ... ( 8 months ago by Uxoriouswidow)
A lot of people see Kant as cold and misanthropic. He's vehemently deontological, and states that acting out of duty though clenched teeth is more morally favourable than doing a good deed out of genuine goodness.
I find it hard to agree with Kant entirely, but you have to credit his ambitiousness and the intellect of some of his points. That said, I find his material quite laboursome to read.
One cool teacher :) ( 7 months ago by hugoestr)
One cool teacher :)
I very much ... ( 6 months ago by MikeG506)
I very much disagree if we must shy away in an entrapic state of unbelief and denial of knowledge , we wouldn't be able to at all as you said earlier acheve any headway in metaphysics - and metaphysics basically abandons any pure reason and does not in turn go against morality and Kant was indeed a theolgian and he did state so and that doesn't give him any dogmatic criticism
the acting in this ... ( 4 months ago by thekempe72)
the acting in this is rubbish
cool i luv puppet ... ( 3 months ago by galpal12345)
cool i luv puppet shows they rock
bich you suck camel ... ( 13 hours ago by pupet24)
bich you suck camel dick



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code