Chomsky : Faurisson Libert é d'expression
Uploaded by: motsor2
Video Description:
Extrait de "Noam Chomsky, les M
édias et les Illusions Nécessaires" (1993). Jeu de miroirs inversés, article lié à la liberté d'expression : http://souk-fares.blogspot.com/2007/06/caricatures-de-mahomet-et-libert.html .
Tags for this video: Chomsky Consent Faurisson Manufacturing Media Propaganda
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by motsor2
| Olivier Mathieu - Dechavanne - ZOG nightmare | Faurisson at Holocaust conference in Tehran | Faurisson Teramo - 1 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Diudonn é Liberté d'expression | What is Revisionism? | "La Shoah, je n'y crois pas" |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














é", i.e. because he denies holocaust. You have to distingue the two charges, wich are not the same. There is a specific article for Holocaust denial in our Code." Even so, was wrong to even charge him for "inciting racial hatred and for racial defamation", as he said himself. The Pen's statement
I mentioned did not itself suggest negation, and according to wikipedia, he was convicted for THIS statement. I don't speak french.
No doubt freedom of speech is important but isn't there a line to be drawn between harmful speech and unharmful speech?
Who would protect our children if there were no laws sanctionning certain speeches?
Isn't democracy the rule by the people, and FOR the people?
Holocaust denial is dangerous!
Refuting the accepted Holocaust story will earn you years in prison in 13 European countries. Why would the truth have to hide behind such draconian laws? The Holocaust deserves to be researched, the controversy exposed, and public debate encouraged. Incarceration for holding an opinion is unquest
ionably fascist. How can we so willingly persecute those who merely *think* differently than us?
See also Christopher Hitchens speaking at the University of Toronto in 2007. Both men are correct. watch-v=EUphTYPMB4o
éo
é le 7 décembre 1928, à Philadelphie en Pennsylvanie, est professeur émérite de linguistique au Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
ître-assistant à la Sorbonne, puis maître de conférences en littérature contemporaine à l'université Lyon II,qui doit on croire ?????
you'd better be working on his linguistic theories.
I believe that Chomsky has made a big mistake in defending Faurisson's "civil right" of saying that no extermination ever took place. Also, I am sure that Chomsky knows it's a mistake, but doesn't have the guts to aknowledge it. It reminds me when Chomsky took the defense of brutal Pol Pot.